Token Gating Platform on Solana: Comparison of Options

If you're looking for a token gating platform on Solana for your community, you'll likely find yourself comparing tools based on similar criteria: ease of setup, Discord and Telegram support, and whether the pricing scales without becoming prohibitive.

In this article, I’ll compare three of the most widely used platforms, along with an alternative we’ve developed ourselves. The idea isn’t for you to stick with just one, but to understand what each one offers and which one is the best fit for you.

Token gating platforms on Solana

Below is a comparative table highlighting the most relevant aspects for evaluating a Solana token gating platform, without getting bogged down in features you might not require.

If you want to learn more about the features of each one, keep reading. Keep in mind that, depending on the channel you want to gating, you’ll need to follow specific instructions or, in some cases, upgrade to a more advanced plan.

If you want to directly access a guide on token gating in Discord, we have one on our blog.

miniOrange

miniOrange feels more like a security and access company that, among its many products, also addresses token gating. This can be beneficial if you are developing something closer to a web portal or a hybrid Web2/Web3 stack.

The problem is that if you are seeking gating for a community on Solana, the solution might feel overly enterprise-grade. Amidst a plethora of products and technical complexities, it's easy to lose sight of the core objective: validating holders and automating permissions.

Key Features

• Extensive catalog of safety products (not just gating).
• Integrations and plugins for platforms such as Shopify and WordPress.
• Opaque pricing for token gating: typically, quote buttons are provided instead of clear plans.
• It might work if your gating part of a broader access and security strategy.

Matrica

Matrica is often presented as an 'all-in-one' solution for community management: it not only verifies holders, it also integrates bots and operational components that some projects require from day one.

The drawback is the cost when both Telegram and Discord are needed, as their hybrid plan costs 75 USD and includes potentially useful tools. However, if your use case is exclusively focused on community gating for Solana, this might feel like paying for unnecessary features.

Key Features

• Base plan approximately 35 USD with holder verification and bot for Discord.
• Plan for approximately 75 USD includes Telegram and adds more tools (e.g., bots for X).
• It offers free plans so you can try out the workflow.
• Designed for teams seeking a bot, verification, and enhanced automation in a single package.

Collab.Land

Collab.Land is a well-known option for its modular approach. It is typically straightforward to understand and deploy, especially if you only require a single platform (either Discord or Telegram).

The critical point for "multi-channel" communities is that Discord and Telegram are billed separately. If your community operates on both platforms, the actual cost virtually doubles. Furthermore, member limits are imposed depending on the chosen plan.

Key Features

• Separate plans for Discord and Telegram; they are not bundled.
• Plan starting at around $18, with a limit of 100 members, and $35 for 1,000 members.
• It offers a free plan, which is useful for seeing if the platform is a good fit for your community.

Ancla

Ancla operates as a Solana-first alternative: it is not multi-chain like the previous ones, which greatly simplifies things if your community lives exclusively on Solana.

Among the most compelling aspects are that all plans simultaneously include Discord and Telegram, and the entry-level pricing is designed to facilitate community operation without encountering restrictive limits. Furthermore, it offers a free trial, and the premium plan incorporates whitelabeling and co-marketing, functionalities rarely seen in other offerings.

Key Features

• A 24 USD monthly plan with unlimited members that includes Discord + Telegram.
• Periodic membership renewal to remove members who sell after joining.
• Pro analytics included depending on the plan.
• 59 USD Expert Plan with smart gating, more frequent monitoring, whitelabeling and co-marketing.
• It offers monthly, annual, and weekly plans, in addition to its free trial.

If you'd like to watch a step-by-step tutorial, I've put together one where I'm setting up a gated community with Ancla you can find it below:

Which platform is best for a gated community?

The optimal platform is entirely dependent on your community and its operational dynamics. A small group with a single gated channel is not equivalent to a community with multiple tiers, dedicated staff, private channels, and a genuine need for automated access control (entry and exit).

If your gating strategy leans towards 'web + Web2 integrations', miniOrange could be a viable option, though its cost often feels enterprise-level and less accessible for communities. If you're looking for a package that includes bots and additional features, Matrica might be suitable, but the price escalates when Telegram integration is added.

If your priority is a rapid launch and single-platform deployment, Collab.Land is typically straightforward. However, challenges emerge when attempting to integrate both Discord and Telegram concurrently, leading to separate plans and limitations.

In a typical Solana community-first scenario, Ancla stands out for its pricing and long-term utility: it not only enables token gating but also helps maintain consistent access when members divest, and provides additional features to scale without re-engineering the system.

What is the average cost of a token gating platform?

Beyond free plans, the actual cost for communities typically ranges from 18 to 75 USD per month, depending on whether a single platform is needed or if both Discord and Telegram integration is desired.

An important nuance must be added to that range: tools with quote-based pricing that can exceed it, but are not always comparable if your sole objective is token gating for communities on Solana.

Conclusion

Choosing a token gating platform on Solana is not about opting for the most renowned, but rather about the operational efficiencies it provides. Furthermore, the ease with which you can integrate a bot for holder verification is another crucial factor. For instance, in our guide on creating a gated Telegram group, we detail that you only need to add Ancla as an administrator to achieve this.

Among the available platforms, Ancla stands out as the most comprehensive option due to its pricing and added community features, especially if you are interested in keeping members genuinely engaged and automating the 'sell-to-lose-access' mechanism seamlessly.

You can review our alternative guides or subscribe to our newsletter for more updates.